Page 1 of 396   Next›  Last» 

Wireless computers close to the body can expose the users as much as mobile phones
United Kingdom Created: 27 Jun 2016
Public Health England (PHE)/Health Protection Agency (HPA) has failed to inform that wireless computers can expose the users to electromagnetic fields as high as from mobile phones when close to the body.

PHE/HPA failed to mention that studies have reported adverse biological or health effects of Wi-Fi and similar wireless signals. Schools, organisations and individuals are thus unable to make informed decisions.

PHE/HPA has said that adults should be able to make their own choices about reducing their radiofrequency exposure should they so wish, but be able to do so from an informed position (PHE website, 1st December 2013). Their advice to schools on Wi-Fi and their failure to speak out about the use of mobile phones by children in schools has prevented children and parents from reducing their exposures in the school environment.

*SNIP* read the entire document (PDF) via the source link below...
Click here to view the source article.
Source: WiFi in Schools, Dr. Sarah Starkey PhD,

'The precautionary principle' and EMF
USA Created: 23 Jun 2016
We humans are bioelectric beings - Independent sources confirm that the rapid proliferation of technology that emits artificial electromagnetic fields/radio frequency (EMF/RF) increasingly is conflicting with our natural EMF matrix and posing significant danger to health and well being of all life. Culprits include wireless computers, wireless utility “smart meters," microwave ovens, cell phones, mobile devices and associated infrastructure.

With Columbia University's Martin Blank, Ph.D., taking the lead, 220 scientists and engineers from around the globe last year petitioned the United Nations, its member states and the World Health Organization (WHO) to take action against an emerging public health crisis.

“The biological facts are being ignored and as a result, the (EMF/RF) safety limits are much too high," Professor Blank said. "The international exposure guidelines for electromagnetic fields must be strengthened to reflect the reality of the impact on our bodies and in particular on our DNA.”

​Studies have found that pregnant women, potential parents, individuals with preexisting conditions, children and electromagnetically hypersensitive (EHS) individuals are among especially vulnerable human populations. ​

​​The Bioinitiative Report of 2012​, co-edited by​ David ​O. ​Carpenter, M.D.​, a professor of environmental health science at the ​University of Albany ​School of Public Health and director of the Institute of Health and the Environment at the university, ​ presents 1,800 ​s​tudies and is one of many non-industry sources citing the risks. "Good evidence … that many toxic exposures to the fetus and very young child have especially detrimental consequences,” the report summary states.

Conventional medical literature defines electromagnetic hypersensitivity as an idiopathic (unknown cause) environmental intolerance that's attributed to electromagnetic fields. WHO​, which says it can't prove cause and effect, does say that reported symptoms are real and that some sufferers report that they ​ “are so severely affected that they cease work and change their entire lifestyle.” ​​Dr. Carpenter​, however, says “… the evidence is strong enough to declare that electromagnetic hypersensitivity is real.” EHS symptoms include, insomnia, concentration difficulties, tinnitus, dizziness, headache, anxiety, nausea, heart palpitation and digestive disturbances. U.S. sufferers who ​have ​describe​d​ their condition as “a nightmare you don’t wake up from” ​serve as canaries in the coal mine​, an early warning.​ ​An estimate of 9.8 million ​sufferers in America will likely grow in step with the escalation of radiation pollution.

Concern about proliferation of wireless devices and infrastructure is a global worry. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO) has assigned EMF/RF a 2​B classification, based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain tumor, the same category as DDT and Hexachlorobenzene, now a globally banned fungicide. In contrast, non-industry scientists around the globe consider the “possibly carcinogenic” classification insufficient for public health protection. ​​The recently released results of ​cell phone frequencies on rodents by the U.S. National Toxicology Program of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has added fuel to that fire.​​ "A pediatrician would be acting irresponsibly if he or she knew and understood the implications of the human and animal cancer data on cell phone radiation and did not offer precautionary advice to the parents of his or her patients," said Ronald L. Melnick, Ph.D., who led the design of the Toxicology study.​

The ​appeal from the 220 scientists and engineers organized by Columbia's Professor Blank is very clear: “We have created something that is harming us … The time to deal with … harmful biological health effects is long overdue.” Their warning urges precautionary measures to limit EMF exposures.

Here in Worcester, National Grid’s January 2015 rollout of the “smart meter" pilot program, renamed Smart Energy Solutions, raised the already heightened concern of residents who object not only to health hazards, but to being guinea pigs for a flawed technology that in 2012, then Attorney General Martha Coakley ​criticized the proposed pilot as too large, too expensive​, potentially subject to cyber-security threats, and lacking consumer choice. The cornerstone of the security-vulnerable smart grid, wireless utility meters, has no place in an authentically “​green” agenda.

With self-congratulatory excitement last year, New York City announced the Big Apple is looking to convert old phone booths into Wi-Fi hot spots, giving new meaning to repurposing​. In contrast, France last year adopted legislation banning Wi-Fi in nursery schools while requiring wireless devices be turned off when not in use in schools serving older children.

The railroad track warning to “Stop, Look and Listen” echoes the protective call from those engaged in reasonable discourse about wireless utility meters and runaway technology. The urgent call is for policies that adopt The Precautionary Principle to act for protection when considerable evidence demonstrating harm has been established.

We’re at a crossroads. Those sounding the alarm are not rejecting technology or looking to take away your cell phone. The call is to consider, that supported by​ credible information there are responsible choices we can make together that will reduce risk and create an authentically sustainable grid, such as wired applications using DSL or fiberoptics.

​It's time to ​change the ​conversation away from the insatiable preoccupation with profit​, fed by the seduction of wireless devices, to judicious, fully-examined responsible action requiring a willingness to examine credible evidence. Adopting The Precautionary Principle is the sanest path we can embrace at this juncture. Otherwise, we remain passengers addictively hooked into wireless accommodation on a runaway train.

- Leslie Saffer of Worcester is an environmentalist, writer and musician, and is involved in the movement to promote public awareness of hazards from "smart meters" and other wireless devices. She has previously worked with the natural electromagnetic field as an energy medicine practitioner.
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Worcester Telegram, Leslie Saffer, 21 Jun 2016

Setting the Record Straight on the NTP Cell Phone Cancer Study
USA Created: 22 Jun 2016
Ron Melnick Corrects ‘Misinformation’ in the NY Times - On May 31, the New York Times ran a piece in what it calls “The Upshot” on the National Toxicology Program’s (NTP) cell phone animal study. The column is a regular feature in the Times that seeks to give readers context for stories in the news. This one was titled “Why It’s Not Time to Panic About Cell Phones and Cancer.” It was written by Aaron Carroll, a pediatrician at the University of Indiana School of Medicine. He expressed skepticism about the study results, calling the effort "imperfect."

Carroll's critique prompted a response from Ron Melnick, who led the study’s design team before retiring from the NTP. In an eight-point rebuttal, Melnick corrected what he called “numerous and misleading statements.”

Read the article here:
http://microwavenews.com/news-center/ntp-nyt
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Microwave News, Louis Slesin PhD, 10 Jun 2016

Electronics increasingly emitting RF noise - FCC to investigate
USA Created: 22 Jun 2016
FCC to Investigate Raised RF Noise Floor - If you turn on a radio receiver and tune to a spot between stations, you’ll find a huge amount more noise in areas of human habitation than you will if you do the same thing in the middle of the countryside. The RF noise emitted by a significant amount of cheaper modern electronics is blanketing the airwaves and is in danger of rendering some frequencies unusable.

If you have ever designed a piece of electronics to comply with regulations for sale you might now point out that the requirements for RF interference imposed by codes from the FCC, CE mark etc. are very stringent, and therefore this should not be a significant problem. The unfortunate truth is though that a huge amount of equipment is finding its way into the hands of consumers which may bear an FCC logo or a CE mark but which has plainly had its bill-of-materials cost cut to the point at which its compliance with those rules is only notional. Next to the computer on which this is being written for example is a digital TV box from a well-known online retailer which has all the appropriate marks, but blankets tens of megahertz of spectrum with RF when it is in operation. It’s not faulty but badly designed, and if you pause to imagine hundreds or thousands of such devices across your city you may begin to see the scale of the problem.

This situation has prompted the FCC Technological Advisory Council to investigate any changes to the radio noise floor to determine the scale of the problem. To this end they have posted a public notice (PDF) in which they have invited interested parties to respond with any evidence they may have.

We hope that quantifying the scale of the RF noise problem will result in some action to reduce its ill-effects. It is also to be hoped though that the response will not be an ever-tighter set of regulations but greater enforcement of those that already exist. It has become too easy to make, import, or sell equipment made with scant regard to RF emissions, and simply making the requirements tougher for those designers who make the effort to comply will not change anything.

This is the first time we’ve raised the problem of the ever-rising radio noise floor here at Hackaday. We have covered a possible solution though, if stray RF is really getting to you perhaps you’d like to move to the National Radio Quiet Zone.
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Hack-a-day, Jenny List, 21 Jun 2016

Wearables at work are the new spy tool, UK workers say
United Kingdom Created: 22 Jun 2016
Despite 3m Britons buying a wearable device in 2015, we are not willing to use them at work, according to new research from PwC.

In a survey of 2,000 workers across the UK, only 46pc of people said they would accept a free piece of wearable technology if their employers had access to the data recorded.

This was despite the fact that two-thirds of respondents wanted their employer to take an active role in their health and well-being. The biggest barrier to adoption was trust, with 40pc saying they don’t trust their employer to use it for their benefit, and in fact believe it will actively be used against them.

“Employers haven’t been able to overcome the ‘big brother’ reaction from people to sharing their personal data,” said Anthony Bruce, people analytics leader at PwC. “If [they] want to overcome the trust gap they need to show that they are serious about data security and communicate openly with their staff about the benefits for them.”

This is borne out by the survey, which found that if workplace benefits such as flexible hours and remote working were promised, 55pc (rather than 46pc) were willing to accept a free wearable device from work.

The reluctance to have their activity tracked at work comes despite a doubling in the purchase of wearables in the UK, which rose by 118pc between 2014 and 2015.

The survey found that younger employees, particularly those below the age of 35, were far more amenable to trading personal data for benefits. Roughly 59pc said they would be happy to use a work-supplied smartwatch, compared to only 30pc of those aged 55 and over.

Compared to a similar PwC survey last June, the proportion of workers willing to make the tradeoff is almost exactly the same at 44pc, which shows employers have made no further inroads into gaining worker trust.

Workplace surveillance has become far easier and more commonplace because of technology. This ranges from heart-rate monitors for NHS workers to GPS trackers for long-distance lorry drivers.

Misgivings about employers spying was further bolstered by a January ruling from the European Court of Human Rights confirming that companies are allowed to spy on employee data, if it is deemed work-related.
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Telegraph, Madhumita Murgia, 20 Jun 2016

Clarifying EMF and Cancer: Precautionary Occupational Strategies and Results of the NTP Cell Phone Studies
USA Created: 22 Jun 2016
Join The Collaborative on Health and the Environment Partnership call on Wednesday, June 22, 2016 at 10:00am Pacific Time/1:00pm Eastern Time.

We are happy to announce our two featured speakers/topics:

Joseph D. Bowman, PhD, of the Engineering and Physical Hazards Branch at the National Institute for Occupational Safety (NIOSH) will present on Precautionary Strategies to Reduce Worker Exposures to Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Magnetic Fields, a Possible Carcinogen

Michael Wyde PhD, DABT, of the National Toxicology Program (NTP) will present on Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley® SD rats (Whole Body Exposure): Report of Partial Findings

Featured Speakers:

Dr. Joseph Bowman is a senior research chemist with NIOSH and is currently assessing occupational EMF exposures for the seven-country INTEROCC study of brain cancer. He is also developing NIOSH publications on strategies for managing workplace exposures to lower frequency EMF. Three of his 60 publications have received honorable mentions for NIOSH and CDC awards. Starting with a 1986 epidemiologic study of childhood leukemia risks from electric and magnetic fields in Los Angeles, he has focused on assessing exposure to EMF from power lines, cell phones, and other sources in workplaces and the environment. He received a PhD in physical chemistry from the University of Wisconsin in 1971 and was a Certified Industrial Hygienist from 1982 – 2011.

Dr. Michael Wyde is a toxicologist at the NTP and is overseeing the NTP cell phone studies. He also manages and participates in multidisciplinary teams of NIEHS/NTP scientists to develop research programs to address a broad array of toxicological study needs for chemicals selected for study by the National Toxicology Program. Wyde serves as the project leader for several chemicals including compounds that are used in consumer products, as food additives, as chemical intermediates, and environmental contaminants. He has a particular interest in chemical mixtures and herbal products, as well the application of dose-response modeling to NTP data for use in risk assessment, such as the determination of Benchmark Doses for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic responses. Wyde received a Ph.D. in toxicology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

This call is hosted by the CHE-EMF Work Group and moderated by Antoinette (Toni) Stein, PhD. Opening remarks will be made by Michael Lerner, Commonweal’s President. This call will last 60 minutes and will not be recorded by CHE. Questions will be taken through our Q&A comments page.
Click here to view the source article.
Source: CHE, Antoinette (Toni) Stein, 22 Jun 2016

Selfies can age the skin and cause wrinkles, warn dermatologists
United Kingdom Created: 19 Jun 2016
For people who believe that selfies are the ultimate display of vanity it may seem like poetic justice.

Dermatologists now believe that regularly exposing the face to the light and electromagnetic radiation from smartphones can damage the skin, speeding up ageing and promoting wrinkles.

Doctors even claim they can tell which hand a person holds their phone in just by looking at which side of the face is most damaged

Related news:
Jul 2015, Ukraine: 93 of 100 studies confirm Oxidative Stress from RF-radiation: review

Speaking ahead of the FACE, Facial Aesthetic Conference and Exhibition, in London Dr Simon Zoakei, Medical Director of the Linia Skin Clinic in Harley Street, said: “Those who take a lot of selfies and bloggers should worry.

“Even the blue light we get from our screens can damage our skin.

“I think there is a gap in the market for products which protect because I know there are people who take lots of selfies, and bloggers who come to me and I have seen that there is damage there and there ageing taking place. It's a different wavelength of radiation so sunscreen will not block it.”

Renowned dermatolgists Dr Zein Obagi, who founded the Obagi Skin health Institute in Beverley Hills, added: “ Your cell phone will damage your skin.



“It’s not documented, but in my clinical observation, I can tell whether someone uses their right hand or left hand to hold their phone. You start to see dull dirty looking texture that you cannot identify on one side of the face.

“I think we need to create a defence mechanism, light has some sort of magnetic think that is happening to the skin.

“This magnetic field is altering the minerals in the skin. A sunscreen will not protect you. But if you saturate your skin with anti-oxidants it can help prevent DNA damage from electronic devices.”

Some experts think that electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones ages skin by damaging the DNA. It can cause breaks in the DNA strand which can prevent skin repairing itself and place oxidative stress on cells.

The experts also argued that most over-the-counter moisturisers and oils do not work and may make skin worse, and that ‘a good scrub’ is the best way to keep skin healthy.

Dr Obagi added: “You cannot hydrate the skin from the outside. We have to stimulate the skin to bring back hydration from within.

“When you put your hand in the water for half an hour you see it white and crinkly you don't see any more hydration. There is a reason that women have more problems with sensitive skin than men. It’s because women use products.
Click here to view the source article.
Source: By Sarah Knapton, Science Editor Daily Telegraph, 17 Jun 2016

Radiation from mobile towers: NHRC issues notices
India Created: 8 Jun 2016
Notices have been issued to the Union Ministries of Communications and Information Technology and Health through their Secretaries by the National Human Rights Organisation (NHRC) regarding complaints of hazardous radiations emitted by mobile towers.

The Commission has called for a report in the wake of allegations in a complaint that mobile phone towers, in the close vicinity of residential areas, are emitting radiations, hazardous to the health of human beings. The concerned authorities have to reply within two weeks.

The Commission while issuing notices has observed that it cannot be denied that today's generation is living amongst mobile towers, digital cables, mobiles etc. The virtual world has encompassed every aspect of human life. In such a scenario, if the allegations leveled in the complaint are true, the Right to Health and Right to Life of a common man is under serious threat.

In a release the NHRC said that the government should adopt strategies which ensure that development is done without causing any substantive damage to the life and health of human beings and other living things.

The complainant has mentioned in detail the ill-effects of electro-magnetic radiations in his complaint by citing various scientific studies and guidelines. He has submitted that a radiation is a threat to man's health and life, especially patients, children, old people and the foetus. He has also referred to a Government order dated 21.08.2013 which states that the local self-government institutions should confirm that "the proposed tower is not coming within 500 mts of schools/hospitals."

He has stated that this order is imperfect because it does not cover "houses" but only "schools/hospitals", which should not be within 500 meters of a mobile phone tower. Allegedly, due to this imperfect and illogical Government order, the mobile operators are violating safe radiation range and are erecting towers in thickly populated residential areas thereby exposing people to electro-magnetic radiation.

Allegedly, a sum of Rs. 10.80 crore was reported to have been collected as fine up to the 31st May, 2015 from various mobile operating companies, for violating radiation range, is a proof that the safe radiation ranges are often being violated by them. The faulty and unsafe fittings of diesel generators to run the mobile towers also cause lot of air pollution.
Click here to view the source article.
Source: MeriNews, Narendra Ch, 04 Jun 2016

Lecture: Electromagnetic Radiation: A Modern Health Hazard? - Dr Erica Mallery-Blythe [CNM London]
United Kingdom Created: 6 Jun 2016
Tuesday 7th June 2016 6:30pm - 8:30pm - Find out how it affects you and what you can do about it.

Manmade electromagnetic radiation levels have risen exponentially in less than one generation. Radiofrequency radiation is currently a Group 2b possible human carcinogen, and cancer is but one of many health concerns documented.

There is a mounting scientific debate regarding the safety of existing exposure limits and scope of possible related illness.

Dr. Mallery-Blythe is an experienced medical doctor with a special interest in the effects of electromagnetic fields.
In this seminar she will overview literature highlighting health concerns, and suggest how to minimise risk.

Held at: CNM London, 41 Riding House Street, London, W1W 7BE

www.naturopathy-uk.com
Click here to view the source article.
Source: EventBrite, 06 Jun 2016

BioInitiative on NTP study: Cell Phone Radiation Study Confirms Cancer Risk
Sweden Created: 5 Jun 2016
The National Toxicology Program under the National Institutes of Health has completed the largest-ever animal study on cell phone radiation and cancer. The results confirm that cell phone radiation exposure levels within the currently allowable safety limits are the "likely cause" of brain and heart cancers in these animals, according to Dr. John Bucher, Associate Director of the NTP. One in twelve (12) male rats developed either malignant cancer (brain and rare heart tumors) or pre-cancerous lesions that can lead to cancer. Tumors called schwannomas were induced in the heart, in the same kind of cells in the brain that have lead to acoustic neuromas seen in human studies. The NTP says it is important to release these completed findings now given the implications to global health. No cancers occurred in the control group.

*SNIP*
Read the entire press release via the source link below...
Click here to view the source article.
Source: BioInitiative Working Group, Lennart Hardell, 31 May 2016

 Page 1 of 396   Next›  Last»