«First  ‹Previous   Page 2 of 543   Next›  Last» 

Brug af sovepiller til børn eksploderer
Denmark Created: 6 May 2016
Vågne timer på hovedpuden bliver i stigende omfang løst med medicin blandt børn og unge.

Særligt danske børn og unge med fysiske og især psykiske lidelser som adhd har så store problemer med at falde til ro, at de i kraftigt stigende tal får ordineret sovemedicin - en medicin, som i vid udstrækning kun er beregnet til ældre mennesker. Det skriver Berlingske.

På bare fem år er der stort set sket en fordobling i antallet af børn og unge, som får udskrevet sovemidlerne magistral melatonin og Circadin.

Sidste år indløste 12.381 danskere under 25 år mindst én recept på præparaterne mod 6391 tilbage i 2011.

Alene fra 2014 til 2015 steg antallet af unge, som fik ordineret sovemedicin, med 20 procent, fremgår det af en opgørelse fra Lægemiddelstyrelsen. Styrelsen har kun en opgørelse for personer under 25 år - ikke for de enkelte aldersgrupper.

Udviklingen vækker bekymring blandt såvel børnelæger som børne- og ungepsykiatere og patientorganisationer og får nu Lægemiddelstyrelsen til at bebude en nøjere granskning og analyse af, hvilke børn og unge som får ordineret præparaterne, og om brugen i det hele taget følger de faglige anbefalinger på området.

Børnelæge Jesper Brandt Andersen, som i årevis har fulgt området tæt, vurderer over for Berlingske, at en stor del af medicinen udskrives af praktiserende læger "med manglende ekspertise og uden forudgående præcis diagnostik, afgrænsning af søvnforstyrrelsen og forsøg på behandling på anden vis".
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Avisen.dk, Ritzau, 05 May 2016

Urgent: Letters of support for Jesus Mendoza (EHS)
USA Created: 5 May 2016
The court date is May 11 - Please write a letter to the Judge.
I do not have the name of the Judge so please just address it to "Your Honor".
Please email the letters to Jesus's friend Mrs. Rosario at: ricnic7@hotmail.com
with BCC to: elliekmarks@gmail.com
In subject line, put "for Jesus Mendoza".

Jesus asked for 3 things to be in the letter.

1) that he be allowed to testify on May 11 via teleconferencing. He is so ill with EHS that he cannot travel to or be in the courtroom due to wireless radiation and/ or dirty electricity. It could be lethal for him.

2) the trial is about his 3 children- the schools have a letter from a doctor saying the children need special accommodations in school because they suffer from EHS. They are ignoring it. The 16 year old has tried killing herself at least twice and his son may have leukemia. We are to ask the judge to mandate that the schools give these children special accommodations so they are not exposed to RF fields while at school.

3) please briefly explain EHS and put your credentials on the letter.

If anyone has a connection with Telemundo please tell them about this- or any media for that matter. Jesus is highly credible- he is an attorney but can no longer work.
Thank you so very much.
Ellie Marks
CA Brain Tumor Association
Source: CA Brain Tumor Association, Ellie Marks (via email), 05 May 2016

Cell Phones, Wireless And Children’s Health Symposium 2016 Pediatric Academic Societies
USA Created: 5 May 2016
Wireless and Children: Why and How to Protect Infants, Toddlers, and Young Children from Avoidable Exposures to Wireless Transmitting Devices.

Watch the press conference video here:

Session 4580 on May 3, 2016 from 12:15 PM – 2:15 PM


Overview on Wireless Exposure and Children’s Health by Devra Davis MPH, Ph.D

The Link between Autism and Electromagnetic Fields by Martha Herbert Ph.D., M.D.

Fetal Exposure to Cell Phones by Hugh Taylor M.D, Yale School of Medicine

The Big Disconnect: Protecting Childhood and Family Relationships in the Digital Age by Catherine Steiner-Adair Ph.D.

Protecting the Brains of the Future by Maya Shetreat-Klein M.D.

Click here to view the source article.
Source: Environmental Health Trust, 03 May 2016

The risk for glioma was tripled among those using a wireless phone for more than 25 years !
Sweden Created: 5 May 2016
November 2014: study published in Pathophysiology: The risk for glioma (a type of brain cancer) was tripled among those using a wireless phone for more than 25 years and that the risk was also greater for those who had started using mobile or cordless phones before age 20 years. Data from 6 cancer centers in Sweden. Study attached.

The actual numbers of gliomas caused by cellphones may be much higher, says neurosurgeon and health expert Dr. Russell Blaylock. "Because of problems with reporting, many gliomas are never reported," he tells Newsmax Health. "It may take over ten years of heavy use to see a dramatic rise, and with younger ages now using cellphones for long periods and sleeping on them, we will definitely see a tremendous rise in brain tumors in the next ten years."

Many studies that show cellphones are safe have been financed by the cellphone industry, he says. "Most studies were designed by the companies and conducted for too short a time to see statistical changes. "The microwaves emitted by cellphones have been shown to cause DNA damage and induce inflammation — chronic inflammation in tissues eventually leads to cancer in a higher number or users," Dr. Blaylock said. "I would bet that the microwaves in the brain activate microglia and this triggers immunoexcitotoxicity —one of the main mechanism of gliomadevelopment."

"I think there is going to be a tremendous effect years from now," he said. "The effects on some people will be minimal, but millions of others, especially those who have DNA repair defects, are going to have a significantly higher incidence of cancer, degenerative brain disorders and brain injuries. If you are a part of that 10 or 15 percent, your incidence is going to be extremely high, and you won’t even know it. "Cellphones aren't harmless," says Dr. Blaylock. "There is considerable evidence that cell phones damage the brain as well as other tissues and organs."


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: A Tsiang
Date: Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:03 PM
Subject: Brain Tumors - Most common cancer in 15-19 year olds, most common cause of cancer deaths in ages 15-39

Please read article below published on Feb. 24, 2016, in which the American Brain Tumor Association has found that brain cancer is the highest cause of cancer deaths in ages 15-39 and the most common cancer among 15-19 year olds.

The full report is available at http://www.abta.org/about-us/news/brain-tumor-statistics/

Dr. Devra Davis shares research on effects from prenatal exposure to cell phone radiation: 3 times more DNA damage, spinal cord damage, damage to memory and thinking part of the brain (hippocampus) from only 15 minutes per day of cell phone radiation exposure for 7 days. Results were statistically significant. The faster cells grow, the more vulnerable they are to toxic exposures. Newborns double their brain size after birth. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZicHZaUKps&feature=em-subs_digest

My advice: Minimize cell and DECT cordless phone use, and if you use them, hold them at a distance. Children should use cell phones only in an emergency, and don't let your child hold the phone next to his/her head. Your child should carry the phone with airplane mode on whenever possible, and Wi-Fi antennas should be off and turned on only when internet use is necessary. (If you don't turn off the antennas, then they are emitting RF radiation. Smart phones have a voice antenna, Wi-Fi antenna, GPS, bluetooth antennas - and they are on all the time unless you turn them off)
Don't carry them in your pocket or bra. ipads, Wi-Fi laptops emit the same radiation - minimize their use as well, use them at a table and don't hold in your lap.
Turn off wi-fi routers when not in use (especially at bedtime), and turn on only when needed.

Please watch this video from the Cyprus government for more precautions to take if you haven't watched it yet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H43IKNjTvRM

Malignant brain tumors most common cause of cancer deaths in adolescents and young adults

Press Release, American Brain Tumor Association, Feb 24, 2016

Chicago, Ill., Feb. 24, 2016 - A new report published in the journal Neuro-Oncology and funded by the American Brain Tumor Association (ABTA) finds that malignant brain tumors are the most common cause of cancer-related deaths in adolescents and young adults aged 15-39 and the most common cancer occurring among 15-19 year olds.

The 50-page report, which utilized data from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) from 2008-2012, is the first in-depth statistical analysis of brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumors in adolescents and young adults (AYA). Statistics are provided on tumor type, tumor location and age group (15-19, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34 and 35-39) for both malignant and non-malignant brain and CNS tumors.

"When analyzing data in 5-year age increments, researchers discovered that the adolescent and young adult population is not one group but rather several distinct groups that are impacted by very different tumor types as they move into adulthood," said Elizabeth Wilson, president and CEO of the American Brain Tumor Association.

"For these individuals -- who are finishing school, pursuing their careers and starting and raising young families -- a brain tumor diagnosis is especially cruel and disruptive," added Wilson. "This report enables us for the first time to zero-in on the types of tumors occurring at key intervals over a 25-year time span to help guide critical research investments and strategies for living with a brain tumor that reflect the patient's unique needs."

Although brain and CNS tumors are the most common type of cancer among people aged 15-19, the report shows how other cancers become more common with age. By ages 34-39 years, brain and CNS tumors are the third most common cancer after breast and thyroid cancer.

"What's interesting is the wide variability in the types of brain tumors diagnosed within this age group which paints a much different picture than what we see in adults or in pediatric patients," explained the study's senior author Jill Barnholtz-Sloan, Ph.D., associate professor, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and Scientific Principal Investigator for CBTRUS.

"For example, the most common tumor types observed in adults are meningiomas and glioblastomas, but there is much more diversity in the common tumor types observed in the adolescent and young adult population. You also clearly see a transition from predominantly non-malignant and low-grade tumors to predominantly high-grade tumors with increasing age," Barnholtz-Sloan said.

There are nearly 700,000 people in the U.S. living with brain and CNS tumors and approximately 15 percent of these tumors occurred in the AYA population during the 2008-2012 time frame analyzed in this report. Approximately 10,617 brain and CNS tumors are diagnosed among adolescents and young adults each year and are the cause of approximately 434 deaths annually.

"The American Brain Tumor Association's recognition of this understudied population, and their commitment to data and information sharing should be applauded," added Barnholtz-Sloan. "There are clearly unique characteristics of the 15-39 age group that we need to more comprehensively understand and the information in the ABTA report starts that important dialogue."
The full report is available at http://www.abta.org/about-us/news/brain-tumor-statistics/.
To learn more or access additional statistics, go to http://www.abta.org.
Brain Tumor Statistics
Brain tumors are the:
· most common cancer among those age 0-19 (leukemia is the second).
· second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in children (males and females) under age 20 (leukemia is the first).
Brain Tumor Statistics:
· Nearly 78,000 new cases of primary brain tumors are expected to be diagnosed this year. This figure includes nearly 25,000 primary malignant and 53,000 non-malignant brain tumors.
· It is estimated that more than 4,600 children between the ages of 0-19 will be diagnosed with a primary brain tumor this year.
· There are nearly 700,000 people in the U.S. living with a primary brain and central nervous system tumor.
· This year, nearly 17,000 people will lose their battle with a primary malignant and central nervous system brain tumor.
· There are more than 100 histologically distinct types of primary brain and central nervous system tumors.
· Survival after diagnosis with a primary brain tumor varies significantly by age, histology, molecular markers and tumor behavior.
· The median age at diagnosis for all primary brain tumors is 59 years.
Tumor-Specific Statistics:
· Meningiomas represent 36.4% of all primary brain tumors, making them the most common primary brain tumor. There will be an estimated 24,880 new cases in 2016.
· Gliomas, a broad term which includes all tumors arising from the gluey or supportive tissue of the brain, represent 27% of all brain tumors and 80% of all malignant tumors.
· Glioblastomas represent 15.1% of all primary brain tumors, and 55.1% of all gliomas.
· Glioblastoma has the highest number of cases of all malignant tumors, with an estimated 12,120 new cases predicted in 2016.
· Astrocytomas, including glioblastoma, represent approximately 75% of all gliomas.
· Nerve sheath tumors (such as acoustic neuromas) represent about 8% of all primary brain tumors.
· Pituitary tumors represent 15.5% of all primary brain tumors. There will be an estimated 11,700 new cases of pituitary tumors in 2016.
· Lymphomas represent 2% of all primary brain tumors.
· Oligodendrogliomas represent nearly 2% of all primary brain tumors.
· Medulloblastomas/embryonal/primitive tumors represent 1% of all primary brain tumors.
· The majority of primary tumors (36.4%) are located within the meninges.

Read Lennard Hardells, Michael Carlberg and Kjell Hansson Mild Study results at link below, please!
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Tsiang/Agnes Ingvarsdottir

Kommunalråd vill införa strålningsfri zon
Sweden Created: 3 May 2016
Kommunen utreder om en by utanför Åsele ska bli en strålningsfri zon där inga mobilmaster får sättas upp inom en mils radie. Byborna är kritiska. – Vi kan inte bo här om vi inte får en riktig mobiltäckning. Som det är i dag är det skandal, säger Dan-Åke Persson.

Åsele kommun utreder om ett område som kallas Sörnoret ska bli en så kallat lågtstrålande zon. Det innebär att inga master ska få sättas upp inom en mils radie nära bebyggelse.

– Det blir en tillflyktsort för de personer som är strålkänsliga. Strålningen tar kål på deras kropp, säger Åseles kommunalråd Brage Sundberg (Åselepartiet).
”Kan inte tvingas bo i en bunker”

Bakgrunden till att kommunen utreder frågan är ett medborgarförslag som skickats in. Kommunalrådet i Åsele är mycket positiv till förslaget.

– Det är inte människovärdigt att leva med de här bekymren. De klarar inte av att bo någonstans och kan ju inte tvingas bo i en bunker med en meters betong, säger Sundberg.
Stark kritik från bybor

Det bor 14 personer i Sörnoret, tolv av dem har skrivit under en protestlista som de lämnat in till kommunen. De har redan idag väldigt dålig mobiltäckning och är väldigt kritiska till förslaget.

–Vi kan inte använda röksignaler för att nå omvärlden. Vi är äldre allihopa, och vi kommer att behöva ett trygghetslarm. Då kan vi inte ha det som vi har det idag. Det här vill vi inte höra talas om, säger Helen Persson, Sörnoret.
”Full respekt för dem”

– Det är en avvägning. Jag har full respekt för dem och deras skrivning ska behandlas. Vi ska titta på om det finns någon teknisk möjlighet att ge de boende en bättre mobiltäckning på något annat sätt, säger kommunalrådet Brage Sundberg (Åselepartiet).

Strålsäkerhetsmyndigheten bedömer riskerna med strålning. Det har tagit del av mycket forskning på området och enligt myndigheten finns det inget som visar på att svaga radiovågor är farligt för människor.

– Vi har vänt på många stenar och kvalitetsgranskat forskningen. Det blir allt mer osannolikt att man ska kunna hitta något som skulle kunna vara hälsovådligt med så här låga exponeringsnivåer, säger Torsten Augustsson, utredare på Strålsäkerhetsmyndigheten.

Enligt myndigheten finns det inget som visar att det finns några hälsorisker med att bo eller vistas nära basstationer så länge dessa satts upp på ett lämpligt sätt.
Litar inte på myndigheten

Förslaget om lågstrålande zoner ska behandlas i arbetsutskottet i veckan. Kommunalrådet i Åsele säger sig ha tagit del av annan forskning som visar att strålning kan vara farligt och ifrågasätter det som Strålsäkerhetsmyndigheten lutar sig mot.

– Den forskningen som är sponsrad av telebolagen, säger Brage Sundberg, Åseles kommunalråd.

Litar du inte på myndighetens rekommendationer?

– Nej, det gör jag inte med den kunskap som jag har införskaffat genom annan forskning, säger Sundberg.
Click here to view the source article.
Source: SVT, Maria Ehrlin, 29 Apr 2016

Doctors Present Evidence of Wireless Radiation Impacts on Children
USA Created: 3 May 2016
Press Contact: Janet Vasquez, JV Public Relations NY (212) 645-5498
Doctors Present Evidence of Wireless Radiation Impacts on Children
Medical Symposium Highlights New Research on Exposure, Brain Development and Behavior.

Who: Leading medical and public health experts:
• Hugh Taylor, MD, PhD, Chair of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine
• Martha Herbert, MD, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University
• Devra Davis, PhD, MPH, Environmental Health Trust
• Maya Shetreat-Klein, MD, Brainmending
• Catherine Steiner-Adair, EdD, Harvard Medical School

What: The nation's leading experts on wireless radiation exposure will participate in a livestream press conference prior sponsored by the Environmental Health Trust to their panel entitled Wireless and Children: Why and How to Protect Infants, Toddlers and Young Children from Avoidable Exposures to Wireless Transmitting Devices at the Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting in Baltimore taking place at the Baltimore Convention Center.

When: Tuesday, May 3rd, 10 am to 11 am EST

Where: Online Press Conference: http://tinyurl.com/jur82y6

How: Text questions to (516) 423-6021 or 917-569-7470 email: questions@grassrootsinfo.org or jvasquez@jvprny.com

Background: The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified both microwave radiation and radio frequency radiation as Group 2B (possible) human carcinogens. Brain models and computer simulations show that children absorb more microwave radiation than adults. A child's skull, which is thinner and smaller, absorbs ten times more radiation than that of an adult. International studies provide significant evidence on the effect of cell phone radiation on acoustic neuroma and glioma. The PAS symposium will highlight new clinical findings about the impact of wireless radiation on the infant and child brain, and propose practical clinical advice on how to reduce exposures.

Dr. Taylor will discuss Pregnancy and Wireless Safety: What Experimental Studies Tell Us About Learning Disabilities and Clinical Practice. Dr. Davis will reveal new modeling of microwave exposures to the child brain and body and the latest international policies to reduce and control microwave exposures to children. Dr. Herbert will present the Rationale for Research and Precautionary Clinical Intervention Regarding Autism-EMF Link. Dr. Steiner-Adair will discuss The Big Disconnect: How Technology Can Undermine Parenting in the Modern World. Dr. Shetreat-Klein will discuss How to Protect the Brains of the Future.

This is an unprecedented opportunity to hear and interview experts on children's exposure to wireless radiation, obtain state of the art video modeling of radiation exposures to the young brain and copies of practical advice to clinicians and parents about why and how to reduce exposures.

* * *

Media Contact for the Environmental Health Trust
Janet Vasquez/JV Public Relations NY
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Robert Riedlinger/Agnes Ingvarsdottir

Lloyd’s of London Insurance Won’t Cover Wireless Radiation Hazards, Health Effects? Local Council bear SOLE RESPONSIBILITY!!
United Kingdom Created: 3 May 2016
Lloyd’s of London Insurance Won’t Cover Wireless Radiation Hazards March 18, 2015
Letter to Government from Sharon Noble – Director of Coalition to Stop Smart Meters in BC Premier Clark, Mr. Bennett and Mr. Reimer,

RE: Lloyd’s of London excludes coverage for claims caused by exposure to non-ionizing radiation.
“Based on inaccurate information provided by ITRON, Health Canada and Dr. Perry Kendall, you have been telling people that there is no health risk due to prolonged exposure to radiation from smart meters on homes and wifi in school — this despite your having received 100s of studies by independent researchers and many letters from scientists and doctors to the contrary.

“I am now forwarding information that should concern you even if the potential health problems these devices cause British Columbians doesn’t. Even though I know that the province and BC Hydro self insure their insurance coverage, I suspect you have a stop loss agreement with protection for catastrophic claims. If this stop loss agreement doesn’t already contain this waiver, soon it no doubt will exclude any claims associated with exposure to radiation from wireless devices such as cell phones, smart meters or wifi. Premier Clark, Mr. Bennett and Mr. Reimer,

“Lloyd’s of London is one of the largest insurers in the world and often leads the way in protection, taking on risks that no one else will. Attached is a recent renewal policy which, as of Feb. 7, 2015, excludes any coverage associated with exposure to non-ionizing radiation. In response to clarification, this response was received on Feb. 18, 2015 from CFC Underwriting LTD, London, UK agent for Lloyd’s:

“‘The Electromagnetic Fields Exclusion (Exclusion 32) is a General Insurance Exclusion and is applied across the market as standard. The purpose of the exclusion is to exclude cover for illnesses caused by continuous long-term non-ionising radiation exposure i.e. through mobile phone usage.”

“This means that the Province (that is we, the taxpayer) will be held liable for claims from teachers and parents of children suffering biological effects from wifi in schools, from homeowners exposed to RF from mandated smart meters on homes, and from employees forced to use cell phones or exposed to wifi at work. Lawsuits in other countries have resulted in huge payments already, and it is only a matter of time before similar lawsuits are filed and won in Canada.

“Potentially those who allow such devices, after having been fully informed about the dangers, could be held liable for negligence, and directors’ insurance may not provide financial protection. Directors’ insurance applies when people are performing their duties “in good faith”. It is hard to argue they are acting “in good faith” after having been warned by true scientific experts and by a well-respected insurer.

“Consider yourself notified once again that you could be held legally responsible for the decisions you have made.”

Yours truly,
Sharon Noble
Victoria, BC.
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Robert Riedlinger/Agnes Ingvarsdottir

Coalition québécoise de lutte contre la pollution électromagnétique
Canada Created: 2 May 2016
Protégeons notre santé ! Réduisons l'électrosmog !
Cette coalition a pour but de mobiliser le plus de gens possible
afin de lutter contre toutes les formes de pollution électromagnétique,
dont notamment celle provenant des compteurs 'intelligents' d'Hydro-Québec.

Développements en 2016
Lutte contre les compteurs 'intelligents'
Pour nous contacter et pour vous abonner à notre liste d'envoi : info@cqlpe.ca
Bonne nouvelle ! - Le RAPLIQ aide les électrosensibles
Consultez les bulletins publiés à ce jour
(Le dernier remonte au 23 mai 2015. Ils ont été remplacés depuis par ce fil d'actualité régulièrement mis à jour.)

Hypersensibilité environnementale et accommodements raisonnables
(Les personnes électrohypersensibles et ayant un diagnostic d'EHS peuvent porter plainte auprès de la Commission des droits de la personne du Québec qui reconnaît l'hypersensibilité environnementale comme un handicap donnant droit à des accommodements, ce qui est une obligation légale. À noter que la Commission ne peut intervenir dans le cas des antennes de cellulaires qui sont de juridiction fédérale. Ces plaintes pourront ainsi contribuer à faire progresser la reconnaissance de cette condition par différentes instances publiques ou privées. Voir leur Guide d'accommodement. IMPORTANT DÉVELOPPEMENT : le RAPLIQ (Regroupement des activistes pour l'inclusion au Québec) a décidé d'apporter un soutien aux personnes électrosensibles désireuses de faire une telle démarche auprès de la Commission des droits de la personne. Tel qu'expliqué ICI, cet organisme « a pour objectif l'élimination de la discrimination faite à l'égard des personnes en situation de handicap et des obstacles limitant présentement l'exercice de leurs droits et de leurs libertés. » La procédure à suivre est expliquée ICI. Si vous voulez déterminer si vous êtes devenu-e électrosensible ou si vous êtes en voie de le devenir, consulter cette description des symptômes d'électrosensibilité préparée en 2014 par le Pr Dominique Belpomme, une sommité mondiale en la matière. Plus de détails ICI. Si vous avez obtenu des accommodements chez votre employeur ou dans un commerce ou un lieu offrant des services municipaux ou gouvernementaux, svp en faire part à actionehs@gmail.com, ou au (819) 674 0576. Votre exemple servira à ouvrir des portes pour d'autres. AVIS IMPORTANT : Le 17 février 2016, le RAPLIQ a diffusé le guide Le RAPLIQ et L'ÉLECTROSENSIBILITÉ ainsi qu'un communiqué de presse en 2 versions courte et longue.)

Vous êtes devenu-e électrosensibles ? Des moyens existent pour se protéger.

Quand l'environnement rend malade - Émission La Facture de février 2015 sur un cas d'hypersensibilité environnementale

L’électrosensibilité : Un problème imaginaire ou réel ?
(Voir aussi Le dogme du paradigme thermique - L'électrohypersensibilité : une urgence sanitaire - Syndrome d'hypersensibilité aux ondes électromagnétiques - Voir aussi ces deux sites québécois consacrés aux personnes électrosensibles : Campagne Je porte un coeur blanc et Électrosensibilité Québec)

Bel exemple de zone refuge pour les personnes électrohypersensibles en France Irradiation nucléaire versus antennes-relais

Candidats à l'écoute
(Le groupe Canadiens pour une technologie sécuritaire a demandé à tous les candidats fédéraux, s'ils sont élus, de consentir à appuyer les efforts visant à travailler avec Santé Canada et les autres agences et organisations concernées afin que soient implantées les quatre initiatives énoncées au lien ci-dessus. Aller voir au lien ci-dessus les excellents résultats de cette campagne dont les lettres d'appui de 4 partis politiques - évidemment les Conservateurs leur ont refusé tout appui - et les appuis personnels de plus de 200 candidats de tous les partis. Le temps d'un véritable changement est venu ! À lire ou à relire : Le rapport du Comité permanent de la Santé déposé en juin 2015 et soumettant 12 recommandations afin de mieux protéger la santé des Canadiens contre le rayonnement électromagnétique de radiofréquences.)

Découvrez la menace du WiFi dans les écoles
Non au WiFi à l'école au Québec - page Facebook à suivre!
Comment connecter un iPad à Internet via un branchement filaire

Voici des instructions visuelles pour diminuer la force du WiFi des bornes "Home Hub 1000" de BELL

Selon WIGLE.NET, au 31 janvier 2016, plus de 235 millions de réseaux WiFi et plus de 6 millions d'antennes cellulaires avaient été géolocalisés autour du monde. Les habitats humains deviennent de véritables fours micro-ondes !
ABERRANT!!! Faire un zoom back à ce LIEN pour en voir l'ampleur mondialement...
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Robert Riedlinger/Agnes Ingvarsdottir

Do Cell Phones Give You Cancer?
USA Created: 2 May 2016
Do Cell Phones Cause Cancer?
2 billion people use cell phones every day.
But how safe are these ubiquitous devices?
Several people have begun legal cases class actions.
Please read more at link:
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Robert Riedlinger/Agnes Ingvarsdottir

AEP must prove 'smart meters' save customers money before charging to 'opt out'
USA Created: 1 May 2016
American Electric Power must demonstrate the financial benefits of so-called "smart meters" before it can begin charging a fee of $24 per month to customers who opt out of using them, Ohio utility regulators ruled today.

The unanimous decision is on an application filed in June 2014, one that had been opposed by consumer advocates.

Rather than accept the proposal as written, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio added some significant conditions.

"We find that customers should not have to pay for advanced meter opt-out service if they are not actually receiving a reduction in costs resulting from the operational efficiencies created by AEP Ohio's gridSMART Program," the panel said in the decision.

The case deals with a new generation of electricity meters, gradually being installed in AEP Ohio territory, which allow data to be shared between consumers and the utility. Some people have privacy concerns about the devices and say want to stick with a traditional meters.

One of the financial benefits of the meters is that AEP no longer needs to do in-person readings. However, if someone refuses to use the smart meters, the company will need to make a trip to read the meter. AEP said the opt-out will lead to a one-time cost per household of $43 and then a monthly cost of $31.80.

Following negotiations with the PUCO staff in early 2015, AEP signed onto a proposed settlement that reduces the monthly charge to $24. The one-time fee remained $43. The PUCO governing board can accept, reject or modify the recommendations of its staff.

The charges had been opposed by the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel and Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy for a variety of reasons.

For now, there is no cost to opt out. Later on, after AEP has done additional filings designed to show that consumers receive financial benefits from the meters, the utility can begin charging the fees. This step will require an additional vote by the PUCO.

AEP Ohio began installing the advanced meters with a test project in 2009, covering about 110,000 customers. In 2013, the company applied to expand the program, called gridSMART, to an additional 900,000 houses in the state. That case is awaiting a decision, and its ruling will help to determine the timetable for the start of the opt-out charge.

Parties in case did not have immediate comments.
Click here to view the source article.
Source: The Columbus Dispatch, Dan Gearino, 27 Apr 2016

«First  ‹Previous   Page 2 of 543   Next›  Last»