News for Canada

«First  ‹Previous   Page 39 of 39 

More Than Quarter of Staff at Wisconsin School Have Cancer (w. comments of Martin Weatherall)
Canada Created: 28 Jun 2006
State Officials Don't Suspect Toxic Source
Teachers, parents and students are upset that the state Department of Health has decided against investigating high incidences of cancer at a local elementary school.
An investigation by ABC affiliate KSTP-TV in St. Paul, Minn., concluded that more than a quarter of West Elementary School's staff -- 28 of 102 staff members employed at least five years -- had been diagnosed with cancer.
Two more former students say they, too, have been diagnosed with cancer.
The New Richmond School Board decided to look into the problem more thoroughly.
"We've got an extremely serious situation there at West," said school board member Bill Brennan. "Teachers are afraid, and parents are afraid. This is important stuff."
Teacher Heidi Swetlik and her husband showed other teachers dirty air filters they had pulled from the school's heating and ventilation system.
"This is what scares us and has scared us for quite some time," Swetlik said.
The school board agreed to request that state health officials perform air quality tests.
"The more tests we can take, the more data we will have and the better we'll know what's going on," said Mike Williams, New Richmond Schools interim superintendent.
No Smoking Gun
State health officials ran tests, but found only improper chemical storage, ventilation system problems, and mold.
"I'm not going to tell you anything that would indicate there's a smoking gun or anything unusual in your school district because there just isn't," said Bill Otto of the Department of Health.
State health officials say the numbers at West Elementary are not out of the ordinary. In fact, they say they've investigated about 40 cancer clusters in Wisconsin and found none linked to the environment inside a building.
Parents and teachers, however, are upset the health department decided against performing an in-depth investigation, and at the response by Tom Sieger of the Bureau of Environmental Health.
Sieger says statistics show cancer clusters are nothing more than coincidence, and added that proper diet and exercise are important to prevent disease.
"Our information on causation of cancer is imperfect," Sieger said. "But what we do know is there are certain things we can do every day with regard to our diet, with regard to exercise."
Swetlik said those comments were thoughtless and insensitive. She says state officials would discover that was not the case if they performed an investigation.
"Here we have all these women who have been healthy, active within normal weight range," Swetlik says. "So it just doesn't make sense."
The Swetliks say they're angry the state's giving up so quickly.
"I'll go to my grave believing that it's not a coincidence," Casey Swetlik said.
"It's quite the mystery, and deep down I just pray that we'll find an answer," Heidi Swetlik said.
After seeing the dirty air filters, West officials say they will now be changed every three months.
Copyright © 2006 ABC News Internet Ventures
NEW RICHMOND, Wis., May 12, 2006 — -
______________________________
866729 Township Road 10
R.R.#3
Bright, Ontario
N0J 1B0
Canada

27 June 2006

Kristen Stinar
K.S.T.P. - TV news
St Paul, Minn.


Dear Kristin,

I came across your name and your involvement with cancer while trying to learn more about an ABC News story entitled More Than Quarter of Staff at Wisconsin School have Cancer, dated May 12, 2006. I hope that your cancer has been terminated and that you are well. I am also a survivor, from prostate cancer. My concern at this time is for the cancer victims at the West Elementary School.

There is a great deal of credible research from countries around the world that shows that electro magnetic radiation is causing cancer and many other serious illnesses. For the last two years, I have spent much of my time collecting research and information about EMR, as I believe that it was the cause of my cancer. I am now electro sensitive and have not been able to live in our home for the last eighteen months because of the effects of ground current electricity. Electro magnetic radiation may also have been the source of your cancer. I know of several TV reporters in the Toronto area that have developed cancer. Their work environments are undoubtedly filled with electro magnetic radiation from the equipment used in modern broadcasting.

The amount of EMR in our lives has increased dramatically in the last few years and at such a pace that we are all becoming endangered by it. There are many sources of electro magnetic radiation, including cell phones and cell phone towers, power lines, transformers, ground current electricity, electrical appliances, electrical wiring, etc. I have attached a document above entitled Electrical Pollution and Our Schools, which will provide you with a good basic understanding of some of the dangers of electrical pollution. You will also find the document 1997 - A curious year in Sweden very interesting.

I am hoping that you will take a special interest in the West Elementary school cancer cluster and ask school, government and state health officials more detailed questions about their investigation and whether electro magnetic radiation has been investigated as a cause of the cancer. Some of the questions that you may wish to consider are: Is there a cell phone mast or tower located close to the school? What are the measurable levels of cell phone radiation at the school? Was a gauss meter used to check the school for electro magnetic fields? (anything above 2 milligauss should be cause for concern) Were measurements taken of electrical fields inside the school? Has the school been measured for dirty electricity? (this should be done with all school equipment running) Are there power lines or transformers which affect the school property? Is there a Wi Fi system installed at the school? Is there ground current electricity affecting the school? If so, what power is it and what frequencies does the electricity contain? Were the homes of the cancer victims checked for the same dangers? If you are eventually provided with measurements, please be aware that government standards are so lax that they do not protect the population. Another wider ranging but very relevant question, is whether the other cancer cluster locations that were mentioned by state health officials in the same story, were evaluated for electro magnetic radiation?

I can provide you with a great deal of research that details the dangers of EMR and electrical pollution. I also know of several experts 'in the field of EMR' who would be pleased to provide information and generally assist you with any potential news stories. I appreciate that you are already very involved in cancer charity work but I encourage you to be more involved in cancer prevention. In my opinion, one of the best ways that you can accomplish that is to make many other people aware of the potential dangers of EMR. With the right information, people can make changes, use avoidance techniques and make improvements in their environment. You should be specially concerned about your own environment. If EMR levels at your home and at work, are unsafe, you may develop cancer again.
Yours sincerely,
Martin Weatherall
519 462 3088.

Health Canada’s Unhealthy Agenda?
Canada Created: 14 Jun 2006
Health Canada’s Unhealthy Agenda?

The residents of Simcoe in Norfolk County and the citizens of Canada in general should be very concerned about the hidden agenda of Health Canada. During the Norfolk council meeting of Tuesday 06 June 2006 residents complained about harm to their health from the recently installed, Rogers cell phone antennas on the Simcoe water tower. Many fellow citizens had conducted research and unearthed facts that clearly showed the dangers of living in close proximity to cell phone antennas. Included in their presentation was information showing that citizens in many different countries have reported cancer clusters and serious harm to health due to the nearby presence of cell phone antennas. Despite the reported health problems related to the antennas, Health Canada and the local health authority have done nothing about investigating the victims health problems, or providing assistance.

Read the whole letter and start a discussion in Mast-victims FORUM

Background:
Jun 2006, Canada: Simcoe cellphone tower to be moved; Neighbours complaint of illness
Jun 2006, Canada: Campaign brews over second cell tower
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Martin Weatherall

Background on cell tower removal, ordered by Vancouver's Board of Variance.
Canada Created: 14 Jun 2006
What Is The Board Of Variance And Parking Variance Board?
http://www.city.vancouver.bc.ca/commsvcs/planning/landuse4.htm#bov

The Board of Variance is an appeal body that hears and then decides upon appeals regarding zoning, development permit, signage, tree by-law, and parking matters. The Board consists of five members, two appointed by the City, two by the Province, and a Chair, appointed by the other members.

The Board is independent of City Hall. No appointed or elected City official can sit as a member. Official City committees or Council may provide information to the Board on particular appeals, but they cannot direct the Board on jurisdiction or whether an appeal should be allowed (granted) or disallowed (denied).

In 1997 I personally appealed the building and development permit of Microcell Communications [Fido] for a cross with microwave transmitters hidden inside it, erected on top of the church next door to my son's elementary school with no public notice, to Vancouver's Board of Variance. Two other parents and I debated experts provided by Microcell, including the scientist who wrote Health Canada's Safety Code 6. We won a unanimous decision and my appeal was granted. Microcell was ordered to remove the transmitters and, in spite of an intervention by Industry Canada, removed them at their own expense. At no time was the city or school community expected to bear the cost of removal or relocation.

A similar situation happened in Calgary the following year. A large self standing tower was taken down at the cell company's expense.

I congratulate Simcoe's Mayor and Council for putting the health and wellbeing of school children and the wider community ahead of Rogers Wireless' economic self interest.

Milt Bowling
Clean Energy Foundation
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Milt Bowling

Offending celltower to be moved in Siomcoe
Canada Created: 12 Jun 2006
As reported in the Bradford Expositor, after a five-hour debate on June 6th in which people living near a celltower tower in Siomcoe, Canada described its effects on their health, the councillors of Norfolk County have decided to move the recently-installed tower.

As per usual, a representative of the cell tower company assured everyone that the tower was operating within guidelines set by Health Canada and Industry Canada and that there no conclusive evidence linking radio frequency waves with illness, adding "The alleged fear can be mitigated by the guidelines."

If you are not aware of the absurdity of present guidelines, please see the section on "Safety standards" in the Notes on the Health Effects of Manmade Electromagnetic Frequencies on my site.

If you are not aware that research has definitely shown the effects of EMR exposure, see the Resarch section of the same Notes, particularly the section titled "proximity to communications towers."

To refer to the fear of the affected residents', who clearly described their symptoms and shared their thoughts in the hearing, as "alleged" is truly adding insult to injury.

This time, local residents were well informed and able to convince their councillors that the mitigation needed called for moving the tower, not applying the snake oil of industry reassurances. One councilman who voted to move the tower warned that this might be the start of similar requests from other county residents who live near cell towers. And well it should be!

Do you live near a cell phone tower? Do you have any of the symptoms of high-frequency illness listed here on the LifeEnergies site? Do these symptoms improve when you spend time away from communications signals?

If you are interested in taking action, please get in touch.

Shivani Arjuna
www.LifeEnergies.com
http://www.lifeenergies.com/serendipity/index.php?/archives/26-Offending-celltower-to-be-moved%21.html

Friday, June 9. 2006
Click here to view the source article.

Simcoe cellphone tower to be moved; Neighbours complaint of illness
Canada Created: 12 Jun 2006
Norfolk councillors have decided to get rid of a cellphone tower in the centre of Simcoe that residents say is a health risk.
After hearing from more than 20 people in an often emotional five-hour debate Tuesday, council voted to move recently installed Rogers Wireless Inc. antennae on the Simcoe water tower - even though it could cost the county an estimated $300,000.

"I'm proud to be a resident of Norfolk County," said Dan Currie, who first raised the issue in February, shortly after the antennae were installed.

"Council was receptive and concerned about the welfare of its citizens," said Currie, who has been unable to live in his century home on Union Street because of symptoms such as nausea, headaches, fatigue and dizziness that he says are caused by the cell tower.

"I was fine before the antennae went up and I'm fine when I'm not at home," he told council.

Students in the senior law class at Simcoe Composite School did a survey of residents in the area - which is close to Elgin Avenue School and Norfolk General Hospital - and discovered several more residents with similar symptoms.


To date, 17 people have reported recurring illnesses since the cell tower was installed.

No evidence

Staff said there's no conclusive evidence linking radio frequency waves with illness. And they noted that the cell tower meets federal health and safety regulations in regard to exposure levels.

But Mayor Rita Kalmbach said she'd rather err on the side of caution when it comes to people's health.

"When I hear people say they only get sick at home, when they're close to the tower, I have to believe there's something to this," she said.

"I believe we have to do what is right and good. But it is going to cost all the people of Norfolk County considerable money."

Just how much money isn't clear. When Kalmbach asked a Rogers representative about the possibility of getting out of the lease before the March 31, 2008, expiry date, Jack Hills said that will be up to the company's lawyers to decide.

He was also non-committal about the possibility that Rogers might voluntarily move its cell tower to another site.

"It's not our policy," he said, adding that the tower is operating within guidelines set by Health Canada and Industry Canada.

"The alleged fear can be mitigated by the guidelines."

Hills also noted that Rogers has many other telecommunications towers that are close to hospitals and schools. Some, in fact, are on top of schools.

However, Magna Havas, an environmental scientist at Trent University, told council that Canada's guidelines aren't as stringent as those in other countries. She cited studies that show an increased risk of cancer, as well as symptoms such as headaches, insomnia and nausea, when people live within 400 metres of a cell tower.

"I think there's enough evidence to cause a concern. I recommend not allowing antennae within 400 metres of schools, homes or buildings where people work."

Havas said she is particularly concerned about the risk to students at Elgin because children are more vulnerable to developing cancer than adults.

Council directed staff to begin negotiating a way out of the lease agreement as soon as possible. County manager Bill Allcock said that process will begin this week but he's not sure how long it will take before the cell tower finds a new home - or what the cost will be to taxpayers. He said Rogers will have to find an alternate location before the antennae can be removed.

Coun. Roger Geysens voted in favour of moving the cell tower but he warned that this might be the start of similar requests from other county residents who live near cell towers.

"I certainly don't want to put children at risk but there's not very many places in Norfolk County where you're not gong to be within 400 metres of some residents.

"I think we're asking for some very difficult times."
Cheryl Bauslaugh
Local News - Wednesday, June 07, 2006
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Martin Weatherall


Campaign brews over second cell tower
Canada Created: 12 Jun 2006
Residents encouraged by council decision to move Rogers tower
The Simcoe Reformer — Families in the south end of Simcoe are deciding whether to make an issue of the microwave cellphone antenna in their neighbourhood.
Residents in the area of Ireland Road are encouraged by Norfolk council’s decision this week to order the removal of a microwave cellphone antenna from the Simcoe water tower at the west end of Union Street.
The Rogers Wireless antenna in that case was installed late last year. The 100-metre Bell Cellular tower behind Sprucedale Youth Centre and secondary school near Boswell Street was erected in late 1997.
“Oh yeah, what we’ll probably do is go around and get another petition,” says Brad Cronkwright, who lives on Ireland Road near the intersection with Decou Road.
Cronkwright gathered a petition against the tower and presented it to the former Simcoe council nearly 10 years ago. Simcoe council chose not to get involved, saying telecommunications issues are a federal responsibility.
Like the dozens of concerned community members who crammed the council chamber at Governor Simcoe Square this week, residents in the southeast part of Simcoe are concerned about the potential health effects of microwave cell tower transmissions.
Chris Cronkwright, wife of Brad, says there’s an unusually large number of people in the neighbourhood suffering from cancer.
And as with the Union Street-Elgin Avenue situation, a number of residents complain of vague symptoms such as headaches, sleep disorders, mood swings, depression, aches, pains and the like. Some wonder if the Bell tower is to blame.
Chris Cronkwright herself beat cancer more than 10 years ago and intends to keep it that way. She’s disturbed that her three young sons complain regularly of headaches.
“It’s an ongoing problem,” she said. “Nothing seems to be causing it.”
Neighbour Lori Ernst also wonders if microwave cell towers are especially bad for young people. She noted that young people are concentrated in the neighbourhood at Sprucedale, Lynndale Heights Public School and St. Joseph’s School on Oakwood Avenue.
“I have kids playing outside all the time,” Ernst said yesterday. “If there is any kind of risk, I want it taken down.”
Ernst added that she’s developed spots within her field of vision since the tower went up.
The situation regarding the Bell tower is significantly different from the Rogers Wireless tower that was ordered removed this week. The Bell tower is located on private property. As well, Bell owns all the infrastructure on the land.
Ken Glasser of National Antenna in Elmira was site foreman for the Bell project in 1997.
Nine years ago, he dismissed theories that microwave transmissions cause illness as “a bunch of hocus pocus.” He noted at the time that the broadcast unit at the top of the Bell tower was rated at eight watts. Glasser said this is substantially less than the 10,000 watts associated with typical FM radio broadcast towers.
“If the seal on the door of your microwave (oven) isn’t perfect, you’ll get a lot more radiation from there than you will from this tower,” he said. “Most microwave ovens are driven by a 100-watt system. There is just no comparison.”

Monte Sonnenberg - SIMCOE REFORMER
Thursday June 08, 2006
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Martin Weatherall

Montreal wants ban on cellphones while driving
Canada Created: 12 Jun 2006
Montreal wants ban on cellphones while driving
Montreal -- Montreal will ask Quebec for a ban on cellphone use while driving and for lower speed limits across the city as part of a new initiative to make the city safe for pedestrians.
André Lavallee of city council's executive committee unveiled a proposed Pedestrian Charter yesterday, a document he says will serve as a starting point for reinventing Montreal as a world-class walking city.
"We are talking about a major shift of culture for a North American city," he said. CP
Canada in Brief

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060608.NATS08PU/EmailTPStory/National
Source: Milt Bowling

Small school sparks wireless furor
Canada Created: 9 May 2006
THUNDER BAY, Ont. - Fred Gilbert is a renowned scientist, an innovative administrator, and an impassioned advocate of the technological advances
required to make his small, somewhat remote Northern Ontario university competitive in the modern market.
So why has the university administrator suddenly become the object of international ridicule?
Here's a hint: Prof. Gilbert doesn't carry a cellphone.

He prefers not to live anywhere near power lines, and, if he can manage it, avoids laying down his head for the night near overloaded electric outlets.

Prof. Gilbert, the president of Lakehead University, has long been wary about what effect electromagnetic fields might have on humans. He doesn't believe all
the scientific evidence on the physiological impacts of these EMFs is in yet, and would prefer more conclusive results before embracing some of the
associated technologies. It is according to that ethos that he decided against having his university go wireless.

The response to his decision has been virulent, incredulous -- downright nasty.

In tones ranging from "ha-ha, get-a-load-of-this-Luddite" to scathing personal attacks, everyone from tech bloggers to media giants like CNN and ABC has taken issue with the decision.

"The next thing to go is electricity at this university," declared one headline; "Why not tear out power lines and transmission towers?" wondered another; and "I'm donning my tinfoil hat and moving my router," derided one pundit.

It should be said that Prof. Gilbert is not wearing a tinfoil hat when we meet in his office. Nor is he clad, on this mid-winter day, in Birkenstock sandals or anything else that would suggest he adheres to the familiar standards of the uber-environmentalist.

There is a computer on his desk, a state-of-the-art VoIP (voice over Internet protocol) phone on his side table. His staff has just run through a whirlwind tour
of the university's Advanced Technology & Academic Centre, showing off its 15 smart classrooms (each of which features a one-touch system integrating
Internet, document camera, projectors, speakers, microphones), and its virtual reality laboratory, which affords medical students the opportunity to do
3-D dissections of online body parts. There are more than 7,000 Internet connections scattered throughout the campus, in Internet-cafe-style workstations, in
plug-ins located everywhere tables are clustered and beside comfortable tub chairs in hallway lounges.

Prof. Gilbert has some solid credentials as a champion of technological innovation, and his efforts "to position the university at the forefront of technology" have been lauded both inside and outside the university, which is what makes his resistance to wireless so much more compelling.

"We're not Luddites," he insists in an interview, the first time he has spoken since his decision gained international attention. The view from his top-floor office takes in the sprawling Lakehead campus and beyond it, the Sleeping Giant rock formation that juts out from the winter majesty of Lake Superior.

Prof. Gilbert has awakened a sleeping giant by opting for caution instead of technological convenience -- deciding against a campus-wide installation of the
technology that makes computer access ubiquitous by eliminating the need for plug-ins or fixed-link access to the Internet.

Wireless, or WiFi transmission, is the latest trend, with organizations ranging from transport companies such as VIA Rail to entire cities, such as
San Francisco, Manchester and even Toronto, rushing to provide the kind of no-cords access that appeases the growing numbers who rely on a wall-to-wall cellphone and BlackBerry existence.

It is this environment that makes Prof. Gilbert's stand seem like heresy. "This is a technology that's barrelling ahead without any checks and balances.... It's a convenience technology," he argues. "I say, as a biologist, that there are potential problems associated with this particular technology. Why should we, for the sake of convenience, put a potential risk in place?"

His concern is for the students, who as young adults have tissues that are still growing, which seems to figure more prominently in the scientific evidence.
The hotly contested evidence includes findings that link some levels of EMF exposure to brain cancers, childhood leukemias, miscarriage, even DNA damage.

While Canadian studies throughout the 1990s found no correlation between proximity to power lines and children's leukemia, a British study last year found that children who lived near power lines were 70% more likely to develop childhood cancer. There was also a groundbreaking report by California health department scientists who recently concluded that EMFs from power lines likely caused childhood leukemia and adult brain cancer.

The latest wave of research focusing on cellphones has similarly shown findings on both sides of the issue -- benign, dangerous -- with some studies finding no danger in prolonged use of these phones, but others suggesting a correlation with brain cancer.

His stance on wireless has introduced him to electrosensitive people, those who are severely affected by EMFs, and whose condition is regarded so seriously in Sweden that it is considered a disability.

Prof. Gilbert concedes most of the findings suggest the impact stems from what is considered chronic exposure, but he says it's still too early to tell what counts as minimal exposure, particularly with the newer WiFi technology.

He has been tracking the research on this issue since the mid-1970s, when he was living in Erin, northwest of Toronto, and the debate was close to home over a
proposed hydro-transmission corridor.

"It never went away," he said. "I did what I could on a personal basis to avoid exposure to EMFs." That means not living under power lines, not sleeping near electrical outlets, and confounding his assistants by eschewing the requisite accessory of administrators, the cellphone.

He says this latest decision is deeply personal, but also practical. There is already some wireless in those areas of the university where fixed link access
isn't possible, but for the main, the conventional technologies provide adequate coverage, he says.

"Whether I'm doing the right thing or not, only time will tell. I don't know whether I'm doing the right
thing. I'm acting from instinct and my background as a scientist and my analysis of the information that's available," he says.

"To be condemned for that is somewhat surprising.... This is what a scientist is supposed to do.... This is what universities should be doing: raising issues,
fomenting discussion, helping people make better choices."
National Post (f/k/a The Financial Post) (Canada)
Source: S: Anne Marie Owens, National Post

Lets join hands and help fund Dr Olle Johansson.
Canada Created: 28 Apr 2006
Re: Radio Interview with Dr Olle Johansson.
Lets join hands and help fund Dr Olle Johansson.
He is our voice to the world and he needs funding in order to keep up the excellent work he is doing.I have and will continue to help our good friend Olle.
We must protect our grand children and their's by making this wonderfull planet safe to live on.
Regards Robert

Contact: Robert Riedlinger: r_riedlin@telus.net

"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it."
Albert Einstein
Source: Robert Riedlinger

Canada and Sweden: Right Livelihood Award 2006 April 10 deadline - Magda & Olle to be nominated
Canada Created: 6 Apr 2006
Back in 2003 I was approached by someone else –also a long term anti-EMF campaigner, making me aware of the Right Livelihood Awards (RLHA), having then
in mind Olle Johansson to be nominated. When finding out that at that time the deadline for nomination just passed (April 10 every year) this topic died for a while until just recently last December, when RLHA was brought up again. So far we very few came to the agreement to also have Magda nominated besides Olle, and my info request with the RLHA Association was responded that Awards might be shared, as happened last year (Maude Barlow & Tony Clarke).

We have known Olle Johansson since the start of our EMF involvement (about 1996). Olle has been working tiredless and always expressing the full truth without siding an quarter of an inch with the industry but supporting his concern about the health and well being of us humans, if not animals and plants as welI. His research is not quite easy, because of the problem that lately his work is kind of “censored” and he has a hard time to get sufficient research funding, which…as we know… most of the time are directly/indirectly coming from the industry.

Magda as well deserved this livelihood, since we/I have known her first over the EMF-L list thanks to guru’s subscription side. I never expected, hence I was
very surprised, when Magda agreed to come to West Canada to testify on our behalf in the SumasEnergy2/Abbotssford 230kV line upon my request via e-mail….and this with very short notice and all at her cost, since the National Energy Board did/usually does not provide participation cost compensation. In our recent Osoyoos TL application –again despite the very short notice- she made herself available again,…and as we all know, shortly before our hearing here in Osoyoos, Magda testified in a Vancouver 230 kV TL application case. We all know Magda too well, and there is no need to explain any further why she should
be nominated!

A problem will arise, and I am sure some individuals of our EMF campaign community around the globe might feel left out or discriminated by the Magda & Olle nomination, which is true….. we have many who worked on this issue tiredless and on a volunteer basis. But that will mean a list of many to be included as well…however, I am sure all of us will agree that in case Magda and Olle would get the Award, that would mean a recognition for all of us! I myself would just
be very very happy in case Magda and Olle jointly would win the award!

I kindly ask you maybe get familiar with the nomination process and share some input, please go to the home site
http://www.rightlivelihood.org/index.htm

and then to the nomination site: http://www.rightlivelihood.org/nominate.htm
and I kindly would like some feedback from you all.
So far I feel a more qualified individual (from one of our EMF citizen group) should submit both nominations.

Magda and Olle have agreed to accept being nominated, once we have progressed with our work, we can then also ASAP inform Magda and Olle what they have to submit from their site, as this is required according to the nomination rules.

I am sorry, I could not approach you a bit earlier with this issue, I was so much occupied in our nearby TL CPCN application/hearing, the written argument stage now approaching.
Please don’t delay your response too long, April 10th is deadline.
Also: please share with others I have not yet included in this list in my hurry.
Thanks,
Cheers and Best, Hans.
Click here to view the source article.
Source: Eileen O'Connor

«First  ‹Previous   Page 39 of 39 
 News item: