- Forums - Sign Up - Reply - Search - Statistics -
www.mast-victims.org forum / General discussion / '5G: EE launches UK's next-generation mobile network'
<< . 1 . 2 .
Author Message
ericgeneric
Member
# Posted: 28 Aug 2019 02:21
Reply 


Just as opposition builds up against 5G in the US and Europe, here come the Brits with their plans to double mast sizes in the UK, and greenlight a radical free-for-all pulsed microwave radiation bonanza.

Nicky Morgan and Esther McVey, we salute you.

This is why politicians parachuted into important positions of power is never a good thing for the people. What do these two individuals know about the actual effects and possible repercussions (I say possible, but it's a given it will not end well) of blasting 5G everywhere? How much have they been briefed by so-called experts and scientists with their own agendas? How much of a kickback are the British Government getting in return for this reckless, unnecessary and chronically ill-timed assault?

EG.

Ann
# Posted: 2 Sep 2019 16:51
Reply 


You are right Eric.
The UK government has been blinded by the mobile phone companies, but then again they have been doing Brexit (or not!) the last 3 years and had no time for anything else. They have not even noticed that the country is suffering from anxiety, depression, bad temper, killings/ suicides, bullying ...............

I never get any reply from my MP when I write about the effects of microwaves on health.

DE
# Posted: 5 Oct 2019 17:00
Reply 


Have you noticed one after the other BBC journalists are getting cancer?
George Aligaiah, Gracie. Derbyshire, Robinson, and one or two whose names I cannot remember. When are they going to learn?
Cancer now has become part of the common diseases, and not long a go I used to tell my students 'don't worry it is an old people's disease'.
People now are told that causation is not the same as correlation, they are just not encouraged to make observations and conclusions.

Yesterday BT rung me up to improve my reception and offered me wifi in every room. (My computer is wired.) So I said wifi is making people ill and causing a lot of social problems so they put the phone down!
I asked for a cheaper deal!

ericgeneric
Member
# Posted: 8 Oct 2019 02:07
Reply 


A young BBC reporter also died suddenly last week. She was 27. They didn't say how (suicide? heart attack? this sudden-death-syndrome that's common among the young now?).

EG.

DE
# Posted: 14 Oct 2019 16:33
Reply 


Yes we hear of suicides and heart attacks among the young now as though it is nothing to worry about. As though it is commonplace. The trouble is it has been going on for a few years and people think it has always been like that. That is happening also with mental illness and epilepsy. Well people have always had these illnesses.
No they have not - they were rare, unusual and unexpected.

The increase in mental illness has began the last 20 years and there has been a steady increase since, but it has accelerated even the last 3 years. The police are saying that those being sectioned has increase the last 3 years by 30 percent - 10% a year. Now that is something to worry about.

ericgeneric
Member
# Posted: 31 Oct 2019 03:00
Reply 


Another BBC reporter has died. Older (52) but all they say is it's following a "long illness". No details.

EG.

DE
# Posted: 3 Nov 2019 15:17
Reply 


I have in the past written to them and suggested that the use of mobile phones and wireless gadgets are making people ill but they didn't bother to reply. Due to travelling these days I listen to R4 and there is a lot about mental illness, stress etc. but they never make the connection. All of a sudden this decade people are suffering from so much stress, depression etc. without an explanation - or it is work, exams, life as though people did not have problems in the past. Mum used to say people have everything but they are so unhappy, what is going on?
knowing how much stress she had in her life she could not understand all these problems and illness. Living in a foreign country with 3 kids and a sick husband she worked hard and made a good life for her family. Now all people do is complain about the unfairness of life.
And telling them that they are being microwaved with all the radiation from their wireless techs causes anger











At one time mmmmm



ww

DE
# Posted: 3 Nov 2019 15:19
Reply 


Sorry but I seem to have a problem with the cursor.

DE
# Posted: 3 Nov 2019 15:28
Reply 


Eric at one time I noticed that there were quite a lot of BBC journalists having cancer, 5 or 6 over the last few years but I don't remember them all now _ Carrie Gracie, James A? V. Derbyshire, George Allagahia, I no longer keep up. But it has become more acceptable. It used to be an old people's disease for people over 60, and that is what old medical books say.

ericgeneric
Member
# Posted: 5 Nov 2019 22:29 - Edited by: ericgeneric
Reply 


Interesting that Bristol - first in the UK to jump on the 5G bandwagon and smother their population with nice untested, pulsed radiation - are now trying to ban all diesel vehicles in the name of reducing "air pollution".

Maybe they ought to think about the 5G they're pumping out 24/7.

EG.

Henrik
Admin
# Posted: 8 Nov 2019 12:51
Reply 


ericgeneric

For some extremely strange reason, RF radiation isn't seen as air pollution, although it fills the airspace and is biologically active.

ericgeneric
Member
# Posted: 9 Nov 2019 15:50
Reply 


BBC News tech-oriented programme "Click" has done an all-out dismissal of 5G harm and danger.

Not surprising when you remember:
the BBC itself - and not a mobile operator - has installed blanket 5G coverage in a small rural community in the UK, against the will of its residents. The school has been boycotted by parents concerned about their children's exposure to the technology.

So the BBC has no interest in being impartial on this subject.


They've too much invested in 5G to allow the truth to be heard or believed.

EG.

Anonymous
# Posted: 13 Nov 2019 17:58
Reply 


The BBC are in denial. I wrote to the 'all in the mind programme recently telling them that some people get depressed due to mobile phones but did not get an answer. I listen to this programme because I am usually driving at this time and often get really annoyed by it but this time I was not on the road so I wrote to them but they don't listen.
They are full of themselves anyway getting their fat salaries.

jonnyc55
# Posted: 6 Dec 2019 21:24
Reply 


BBC News tech-oriented programme "Click" has done an all-out dismissal of 5G harm and danger.

From what I have been reading there is very little studies on the biological impacts of 5G. I don't know how BBC think it is ok to broadcast to millions that 5G is harmless.

It isn't. We have to keep on top of the radiation with either nutrition or exercise to ward off its fatiguing effects and its other effects. For some people this comes naturally but not for everyone.
I find it especially insulting to blast peoples homes/bedrooms with 24/7 radiation when you live near the cell towers without any power to stop it.

I seldom use my phone so the radiation I am exposed to is utterly pointless.

I can do without the radiation onslaught. My phone must be used for 0-4 minutes at most each day. Sometimes not at all. Not exactly on-demand radiation is it?

It simply is degrading throwing out all this invisible radiation out to the environment without full knowledge to its effects.

Its 24/7 mainly un-used emittance is extremely reckless and a massive waste of Earth's resources being used to generate that un-used electrical energy.

"The increased power consumption of next-generation basestations may be one of the dirty little secrets of 5G, which might not be a secret much longer as operators roll out initial networks.
The power consumption of a 5G basestation is three times that of its 4G LTE predecessor, according to Zhengmao Li, EVP at China Mobile, at a presentation at Mobile World Congress last week, as noted by my Heavy Reading Colleague, Gabriel Brown:"
https://www.lightreading.com/mobile/5g/power-consumption-5g-basestations-are-hungry-h ungry-hippos/d/d-id/749979

Basically with little science and enough buzzwords to let the public lie to themselves, the telecom industry is allowed unfettered access to beam what they like across the environment for both the planet and all living organisms to endlessly endure with the protection of the law.

Anti-life is what that is.

ericgeneric
Member
# Posted: 7 Dec 2019 01:58
Reply 


I still can't work out this thing with LED lighting in the streets/roads; how blasting out wifi/4G/EMR around the clock at a constant, relentless level is saving energy compared to a bulb in the lamp which is programmed to turn on and off at a set time each day.

If you leave your smart hub fired up 24/7, your energy bill isn't going to be less than turning it on and off only when you are using it.

So I guess the reason it doesn't seem to make sense, is because it doesn't. What a surprise.

EG.

<< . 1 . 2 .
Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Underlined Style  Image Link  URL Link 

» Username  » Password 
You can post anonymously by entering a nickname with no password (if that nickname has not been taken by another member) or by leaving both fields empty. If you have an account you can also log in from this page without posting a message.
 

These forums are running on community script miniBB™ © 2001-2024