- Forums - Sign Up - Reply - Search - Statistics -
www.mast-victims.org forum / General discussion / PETITION.... Move radio frequency radiation from Class 2b to Class1 carcinogen
Author Message
Torment
# Posted: 24 Nov 2014 18:39
Reply 


https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/IARC_WHO_Move_Radio_Frequency_Radiation_from_Cla ss_2b_to_Class_1/?sdbXHfb

agnes
# Posted: 25 Nov 2014 02:17
Reply 


Torment.
My name is Agnes, the owner of this website.
Please tell me, are you male or Femail?
Regards.
Agnes

Toremnt
# Posted: 25 Nov 2014 11:35
Reply 


Hello Agnes, I am female.

Kind Regards,

Mary

agnes
# Posted: 26 Nov 2014 02:00
Reply 


Hi Torment. (I had a suspision you were)

Thanks a lot for the link to the petition.
Just to let you know that I have mailed it to All I know in the rest of the world, asking them to partake.
I will now also put the link on MV News and ask people to sign.
Best regards.
Agnes

agnes
# Posted: 26 Nov 2014 02:06
Reply 


Torment.
Here is the link to the MV News item:
http://www.mast-victims.org/index.php?content=news&action=view&type=newsitem&id=6643
I will also put in a link to this Forum page on News ank ask people to join in the debate.
Best regards.
Agnes

Torment1
# Posted: 29 Nov 2014 21:29
Reply 


This petition now has over a thousand signatures.....looking to reach 2000

https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/IARC_WHO_Move_Radio_Frequency_Radiation_from_Cla ss_2b_to_Class_1/?wdbXHfb

agnes
# Posted: 6 Dec 2014 01:09
Reply 


Hi Come ON You Lot.
Give This Petition Your Vote!
And Much More Importantly, Send it to ALL YOY KNOW!

This is Very Serious, We Need To get a Very High Number of Voters for us "EHS" to be taken Seriously At All.

And here I am, NOT talking about 3000, We need to be close to a million people, worldwide, before the Comfy (Taxpayer supported and Highly Paid) Bureaucrats at the WHO, UN will take us seriously, so Please get Voting and please Share it to All you know and who know you and know what you are going through with this "Environmental Pollution INDUCED" sickness.
Please!
Agnes

Torment
# Posted: 9 Dec 2014 17:18
Reply 


I am baffled as to why this petition doesn't already have a million signatures. Prof Hardell has himself has said to sign it...Please everyone sign and share.
https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/IARC_WHO_Move_Radio_Frequency_Radiation_from_Cla ss_2b_to_Class_1/?nHHJhfb

Torment
# Posted: 14 Dec 2014 13:28
Reply 


Lennart Hardells blog..... https://lennarthardellenglish.wordpress.com/ this petition has arisen because his study....rf-emfs should be reclassified as a type 1 carcinogen....and not type b2 a possible human carcinogen.

This is the petition, please sign if you have not done so already...
https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/IARC_WHO_Move_Radio_Frequency_Radiation_from_Cla ss_2b_to_Class_1/?tZYBMib

Torment
# Posted: 18 Dec 2014 11:10
Reply 


From Just Prove it....5000 studies... http://justproveit.net/content/studies

Please sign the PETITION

https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/IARC_WHO_Move_Radio_Frequency_Radiation_from_Cla ss_2b_to_Class_1/?sdbXHfb

Torment
# Posted: 18 Dec 2014 19:06
Reply 


https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ2RMHBG6eYi9jIltg4Yjlohf291DTAx Apw5X_KKDUClInvaKk0

agnes
# Posted: 20 Dec 2014 02:13
Reply 


Torment. We are getting there but very slowl.
There is a Very long way still to go before we hit a million, but I have spoken to Liz, the initator of this petition, and she agrees with me that we just keep it running till we get there, so All please get signing and get everyo ne else you know ,like family to do the same

Sorry, but I have been hacked, which counts for the gaps between words
Best regards Agnes

Torment
# Posted: 20 Dec 2014 10:48
Reply 


I post the petition on twitter regularly every day....it would help if everyone did this, if they don't already......

https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/IARC_WHO_Move_Radio_Frequency_Radiation_from_Cla ss_2b_to_Class_1/?sdbXHfb

agnes
# Posted: 16 Feb 2015 01:16
Reply 


Hi Marie.
We have now reached over 5000, and after the EESC scandal we will have time to send it out again, Liz hoped for 1000, we want a Million.
So, we will be charging the petition up again in a very few days.

The result so far has been amazing, but we want LOADS MORE!
So, please we All have to go at it again with please to people to sign.
And IT IS ALL ANONYMOUS really, as you dont need to give your real name, so What is the harm if you are affected/concerned in the first place?Agnes
All the best.

Torment
# Posted: 19 Feb 2015 09:44
Reply 


Thank you Agnes...I'll start putting it in Twitter again...I am truly amazed that the petition hasn't already reached a million signatures. Is it because people think they are going to have to give up their mobile phones and wifi? This petition is about making them safer.

If anyone hasn't signed it....think of it as providing a safer future for yourself and your loved ones, No one is planning to deprive you of your phone.

agnes
# Posted: 21 Apr 2015 22:30
Reply 


Hi all.
Remember our Petition.
Well, it needs a real kick, so if you haven´t already signed and round sent it to all you know and asked them to sign and send it to All They know please do so now, again.
There are people from All over the world who have signed, but we need so many more, Ideal would be to reach 1 million (preferably +)
So please do your bit, if is meant for OUR Good, remember.
All the best
Agnes

agnes
# Posted: 21 Apr 2015 22:31
Reply 


Hi all.
Remember our Petition.
Well, it needs a real kick, so if you haven´t already signed and round sent it to all you know and asked them to sign and send it to All They know please do so now, again.
There are people from All over the world who have signed, but we need so many more, Ideal would be to reach 1 million (preferably +)
So please do your bit, if is meant for OUR Good, remember.
All the best
Agnes

sizzle
Member
# Posted: 22 Apr 2015 09:07
Reply 


Thanks, Agnes--will do. This is an important issue.

Henrik
Admin
# Posted: 22 Apr 2015 23:25
Reply 


A recent article provides insight into how the head of IARC monographs section views the evidence: http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/can-cell-phones-cause-brain-cancer/

excerpt (bold emphasis by me):
-------------
There is currently no firm plan to reassess radiofrequency EMF radiation, but Dr. [Kurt] Straif says it is on the radar, and if important new evidence was to emerge, the IARC Monographs group could make it a priority.
-------------

The recent study out of Germany confirming that even very weak 3G radiation acts as a cancer promoter, sure gets my vote for "important new evidence". Along with last years french CERENAT mobile/cancer study that supports the INTERPHONE and Hardell studies, shows an increased brain cancer risk for mobile users with an average 30 minute daily use over a 5 year period. This paints a clear picture of the carcinogenic potential of certain signal types.

I write "certain signal types" because new evidence has shown that weak signals with a time-varying pulse frequency can have beneficial effects, like causing cancer cells to rapidly increase calcium uptake and die while leaving normal cells unaffected. This is actually the same mechanism suspected to cause EHS but a certain variable pulse scheme seems to only affect cancerous cells.
Wireless telecommunications signals use a time-constant pulse frequency and exposure to those seems to carry adverse effects. In fact, U.S. military research done in the mid-80's showed that overlaying a random noise-field on a time-constant pulse signal, could neutralize some of the known adverse effects. The WHO was made aware of this in 2003.
See: http://www.who.int/peh-emf/meetings/archive/en/paper13klintestam.pdf

A picture is emerging that it is the structure of the signal, ie. the information in a signal, that creates that biological effect, via sensors on cell-membranes, and not simply the intensity, which, unfortunately is the sole basis for current exposure guidelines.

Agnes
# Posted: 24 Apr 2015 01:33
Reply 


Thank you Henrik.
Your input is of great importance.
Best regards.
Agnes

sizzle
Member
# Posted: 24 Apr 2015 23:36
Reply 


I've heard about alternative cancer treatments where cancer cells are targeted with heat. This supposedly liquifies the cancer (without causing damage to surrounding cells) so it can be more easily eliminated from the body. I don't know what type of technology is used exactly, but it seems to work for a lot of people.

Henrik
Admin
# Posted: 25 Apr 2015 00:11
Reply 


sizzle,

Its done by inserting a needle (that acts as a tiny microwave antenna) into the tumour and killing the cancer cells with bulk RF heating.

Any particular reason why you're keen on changing the direction of the discussion from non-thermal to thermal effects?

agnes
# Posted: 25 Apr 2015 02:12
Reply 


Sizzle.
It is called Proton Therapy: A NON-NHS Brithish sucess story here:
Ashya King is now cured of his brain cancer.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2756189/Ashya-King-begins-proton-therapy-trea tment-brain-tumour-Prague-19-days-parents-removed-NHS-hospital.html

And the "Fact Sheet" about what it is: Here: http://www.oncolink.org/treatment/article.cfm?aid=541&id=433&c=186
Hope this helps.
Best regards.
Agnes

agnes
# Posted: 25 Apr 2015 02:15
Reply 


Hi all.
Stop procrastinating and put your vote to the Petitition.
This is so Important to All Of Us, so PLEASE Get With it.
Best to you all.
Agnes

sizzle
Member
# Posted: 25 Apr 2015 23:57
Reply 


"Any particular reason why you're keen on changing the direction of the discussion from non-thermal to thermal effects?"

Really? You were mentioning RF technology that can target cancer cells specifically and I simply commented on people that I know who have benefited from alternative treatments technology that does just that (and I admitted i had no idea what the technology was). And it didn't involve sticking a needle into organs either. As I mentioned, I'm just a layperson, so your mentioning thermal vs non-thermal has little meaning to me.

To me, all EMR is potentially "thermal." I've had my share of skin burns from laptops, cell phones, CFLs, other "energy saving" fluorescent bulbs,
metal halide lamps, etc.--the aforementioned lighting never failing to leave me with red eyes, disrupted sleep, red rashes/burns), static electricity build up, and burning sensations. If you are fortunate enough to not be electrosensitive to this extent, then good for you--be thankful. But don't bother to tell me what's thermal and not thermal. Unless you are electrosensitive, you have no clue.

sizzle
Member
# Posted: 26 Apr 2015 00:47
Reply 


Agnes--that could be it. It's a targeted beam that does no damage to the skin or surrounding tissues, but penetrates the body and targets cancer cells.

agnes
# Posted: 11 Jun 2015 01:39
Reply 


Hi all.
Have you signed Liz (and by now very much as well MV) Petition?
Well, if you have not, get going and Please sign it NOW: as well as round-send it to All Your Friends and family, and your e-mail list.
Here: https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/IARC_WHO_Move_Radio_Frequency_Radiation_from_Cla ss_2b_to_Class_1/?sdbXHfb
France and Canada have really boosted the petition, but we need Thousands more to join, so please SIGN! it could be the best thing you Ever Did, and ONLY In Your Own Interest!!
It is US this petition is fighting for, so get signing, PLEASE!
Best regards.
Agnes

charles
Member
# Posted: 13 Jun 2015 17:22
Reply 


I am sorry, but Avaaz petitions do not have the slightest influence, as can be seen by other Avaaz petitions.

Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Underlined Style  Image Link  URL Link 

» Username  » Password 
You can post anonymously by entering a nickname with no password (if that nickname has not been taken by another member) or by leaving both fields empty. If you have an account you can also log in from this page without posting a message.
 

These forums are running on bulletin board script miniBB™ © 2001-2020