- Forums - Sign Up - Reply - Search - Statistics -
www.mast-victims.org forum / Health / Good meta study on EMRs
Author Message
plopplop
# Posted: 31 May 2018 17:34
Reply 


https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/60001122232.pdf

thanks to Jinna @ES forum

Conclusions
The analysis of modern data on biological effects of low-
intensity RFR leads to a firm conclusion that this physical
agent is a powerful oxidative stressor for living cell. The
oxidative efficiency of RFR can be mediated via changes in
activities of key ROS-generating systems, including mito-
chondria and non-phagocytic NADH oxidases, via direct
effects on water molecules, and via induction of conformation
changes in biologically important macromolecules. In turn, a
broad biological potential of ROS and other free radicals,
including both their mutagenic effects and their signaling
regulatory potential, makes RFR a potentially hazardous
factor for human health. We suggest minimizing the intensity
and time of RFR exposures, and taking a precautionary
approach towards wireless technologies in everyday
human life

Henrik
Admin
# Posted: 1 Jun 2018 21:51
Reply 


Hi plopplop,

We covered that study when it came out in 2015, here:
https://www.mast-victims.org/index.php?content=news&action=view&type=newsitem&id=6863

and here:
https://www.mast-victims.org/index.php?content=news&action=view&type=newsitem&id=6842

plopplop
# Posted: 3 Jun 2018 14:06
Reply 


"Click here to view the source article." .........Dont lead to the source article any more....



https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/60001122232.pdf ........Does. Thanking you.

Henrik
Admin
# Posted: 4 Jun 2018 13:23
Reply 


plopplop,

In my browser they do, however the one site having a HTTPS certificate problem.

plopplop
# Posted: 11 Jun 2018 11:03
Reply 


http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/docs/emf_6.pdf

An Update on Neurological Effects of Nonionizing Electromagnetic Fields by Prof. Henry Lai,PhD,

Another list of loads of research.

What I do not understand with these trials is why they use animals whos size would not have the same effect as it would on humans???? Surely waves shorting inside flesh would be pulsed if the animals size was less than the dielectric wavelength? Surely they need to use pig sizes??? Is this a piss take or am I getting this all wrong please??? This is a general criticism of all these trials and not just this list. Does any one else think this is anomalous?

plopplop
# Posted: 11 Jun 2018 21:35
Reply 


http://www.stralskyddsstiftelsen.se/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/FRIESEN-submission-to- WHO-EHC-RF-Draft-Monograph_missedpapers_2014.pdf


15 December 2014
To: WHO EHC RF, International EMF Project
See: http://www.who.int/peh
-
emf/research/rf_ehc_page/en/
https://extranet.who.int/datacol/form.asp?id=3092
emfproject@who.int
vandeventere@who.int
From: Margaret Friesen, M.Sc.Winnipeg, Canada

Anonymous
# Posted: 14 Oct 2018 20:22
Reply 


https://www.telecompowergrab.org/science.html

plopplop
# Posted: 30 Oct 2018 17:02
Reply 


https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118303475?fbclid=IwAR3M6HK6 OOzxWcbsaREPtlox5YmN8xW8HxTPXxe0CjuT-X_D38yKfcz8Nnk

Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields

plopplop
# Posted: 8 Nov 2018 22:22
Reply 


https://ehtrust.org/clear-evidence-that-radiofrequency-radiation-is-a-multi%E2%80%91s ite-carcinogen-hardell-and-carlberg-publish-ntp-commentary/

Anonymous
# Posted: 10 Nov 2018 17:48
Reply 


And so we are all f***** but is anybody listening?
My evidence is observing all around me - yes I know it is not a double blind peer revued controlled trial but it gives some indication of what is going on. My aunts and uncles who are many are well into their 80s without any cancers, they have the usual illnesses of those years - arthritis, COPD, heart disease but no cancers. Some of their children already have been diagnosed with breast cancers (2), lymphoma (1), prostrate cancer (2), eye cancer (1), all before the age of 60.

plopplop
# Posted: 17 Nov 2018 11:24
Reply 


The law says its down to you to protect your self from EMR. You were warned. Sadly having big lonely house and big rooms and expensive better made electronics does give the rich a big advantage over crowded multistory poor housing with cheap crap electronics. 15 years in life expectancy advantage.
There is a big advantage to being a hippie. May be thats why the establishment hates them so very much and pushes them so hard. Jealousy.

ann
# Posted: 17 Nov 2018 18:08
Reply 


I think some people are rebelling against this and are going back to a more simple life.
Ah I wish!

plopplop
# Posted: 17 Nov 2018 19:21
Reply 


https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/reveh.ahead-of-print/reveh-2016-0011/reveh-2016-0011 .xml?format=INT&fbclid=IwAR2EfP2UGea7mki-jbkeUG_v7-XX-RnH908O-GKQk_KM6yivim0ny1ucrtc

ann
# Posted: 28 Nov 2018 18:17
Reply 


good thanks

Your reply
Bold Style  Italic Style  Underlined Style  Image Link  URL Link 

» Username  » Password 
You can post anonymously by entering a nickname with no password (if that nickname has not been taken by another member) or by leaving both fields empty. If you have an account you can also log in from this page without posting a message.
 

These forums are running on simple bulletin board miniBB™ © 2001-2018