|
|
| «Latest ‹Forward News item: 4229 Back› Oldest» |
| Essex EHS study manipulated to show no effect | |
| United Kingdom | Created: 4 Aug 2009 |
|
Unpublished data sent from one of the lead researchers to a study participant reveals how dubious math skewed the results. The data shows how 70% of EHS participants actually got the "ON" signals correct and how Essex researchers redefined the concept of "chance". For some reason, Essex researchers assumed that electrohypersensitivity symptoms act like a perfect on/off switch so that symptoms would onset and disappear at exactly the same time as the signal. So, the Essex researchers assumed that EHS had to detect both "ON" (signal) and "OFF" (no signal) equally well in order for the results to count. Problem with that was that insufficient "washout" time was allowed in a shielded area for EHS participants to normalize after the journey to the study facilities. Read the evidence here, (5 page PDF) or via the source link below. |
|
|
|
|
| Click here to view the source article. | |
| Source: Phillip Watts, 04 Aug 2009 | |
| «Latest ‹Forward News item: 4229 Back› Oldest» |